🔗 Share this article

A Denmark-based citizen has been found guilty of sharing sexually explicit segments from copyrighted movies and TV series on the social media platform Reddit.

Based on a law enforcement report reviewed by media outlets, the anonymous man shared 347 clips of nude scenes in a subreddit he managed, which were then viewed 4.2 million-plus times.

The country's authorities state he has been handed a seven-month suspended sentence for violating copyright laws.

Legal analysts explain the man was prosecuted under a rarely-used clause in Danish intellectual property legislation, with the judge finding that by taking the scenes out of their original context, the accused had damaged the artists' "ethical entitlements".

He has also been convicted of distributing more than 25 TB of copyrighted digital content.

From spring 2022 to mid-2023, the man known as "KlammereFyr" on Reddit uploaded sexually explicit scenes featuring over 100 actresses.

He shared them in the forum he was a administrator of.

Per the Denmark's copyright protection organization the Rights Alliance, his subreddit had more than 6,000 subscribers and users were prompted to ask for excerpts of specific performers.

In last year, advocates reported the case to the police on behalf of the impacted actors, filmmakers and producers, which resulted in the forum being closed down.

Andrea Vagn Jensen, one of the performers whose nude scenes were shared in the community, told Danish broadcasters at the period she believed there was a difference between being seen unclothed in a movie and being shown on Reddit.

The actress said the posts amounted to "abuse".

'An important signal'

The defendant was arrested in September 2024 and pleaded guilty to the charges recently.

In a statement following the ruling, TRA head the organization's leader said the outcome sent an "important" message "indicating violations of artists' rights have repercussions".

The ruling is considered unique in Denmark for its use of the "ethical protections" clause of the national copyright law, which specifies an creator's work cannot be used in a way which infringes upon their reputation.

Intellectual property expert a legal scholar told BBC News the legal matter was "rare" for its emphasis on the damage to the integrity of an performer, rather than to them economically.

How the ruling could affect other countries is unclear.

But she added there may be "more and more of such cases" in the future with the advancement of AI, where "the integrity of an individual's work might be tempered with with greater ease".